California’s Prop 65 Law Update

March 7, 2018

Steve asks,

Would you have any information in regards to changes in California’s Proposition 65 law?  These are changes in labeling and marketing requirements for products that contain ingredients known to the State of California to cause cancer and/or reproductive harm, and I’m specifically interested in any known requirements from corrugated convertors and/or harmful ingredients in corrugated.

Here is the list of Chemicals Known To The State To Cause Cancer Or Reproductive Toxicity sent to us from our customer. They also provided a list of all the products we make for them in which we must disclose any products that have chemicals that appear on the other list.

Below is a related article for your readers’ reference:

Our understanding is that as long as none of the materials used to manufacture the box (paper, starch, ink, glues, tapes or staples, etc.) have any of the chemicals that appear on the Proposition 65 list then you are okay and should not need to add any additional markings to the box.

Reach out to your suppliers and put the responsibility on them to certify the materials they provide comply with Prop 65. They would be the best source to know what is in the raw materials. You probably already request and keep on hand Safety Data Sheets from each of your suppliers. It’s always good to keep these on file and up to date just in case a question ever arises. Also in today’s legal environment, it’s important to have a paper trail to protect yourself and your company.

As far as the products contained in the box, it is up to your client to disclose their product warnings based on what they put into the box.

If any of our readers would like to share their knowledge and experience with California’s Proposition 65 Law, send us a comment. Our community is best when we all participate!

— Ralph


Global Percent of Medium

March 6, 2018

Mike asks,

I have a question on what the % medium should be globally. I’m trying to get a handle on it algebraically so to speak.

Classic corrugated sheet, in my mind, is one 26# medium sheet and two 42# liner sheets.  The medium has a wiggle factor of ~1.3 so,

Medium % = 26*1.3/(26*1.3+42*2) = ~ 29%.

Does this sound reasonable?  As BWs tend downward, my gut tells me there is more % medium overall but I am thinking still less than a third.

Twenty five years ago, here, it was indeed 42/26/42 with C flute having a take up factor of 1.43.  Then the sheet feeders began to request 23# medium and corrugating rolls started to have lower profiles which reduced the take-up factor.  Then we moved to 35# and today that probably is 33/23/33.  Globally the World Containerboard Organization tracks total containerboard production.  Additional information may be available through them.

— Ralph

Assembled Corrugated Blank Tolerances

February 23, 2018

Kevin asks,

Is there an industry-standard tolerance that would be applied to the assembled dimensions (Length, Width, Depth) of a 2pc carton?  I would question whether multiple processes should lead to alternate tolerances when compared to a single process 1-piece carton.  I would also wonder how carton size would play into the tolerance and if there are any steadfast rules and/or guidelines throughout the industry.

The particular carton I am trying to apply tolerance to is a 2pc Partial Overlap Top, HSC bottom where the width panels are die cut and the other scoring off of a press and then offset stitched within the length panel for reference.  I am trying to hold +/- 1/8” on all dimensions now.  These tend to be around 76 x 32 x 50” with 2” POL.

According to the Joint PMMI/FBA publication PMMI B155-TR2.2-2011,  the tolerance of a RSC panels are +/- 1/16 inch per panel with an overall blank tolerance of +/- 1/8 inch for both length and width. Also, I believe there is a TAPPI publication of dimensional accuracy which may make reference to tolerance.

Slot depth should be within 1/8 inch from the center line of the corrugator score. Slots should also be centered within 1/16 inch of the aligning scores.

No allowance is given for carton size, caliper, substrate or complexity of design in this specification.

I haven’t found any reference to multiple piece cartons which would lead me to believe that there would be an additional allowance for a multi-piece carton.

So, based in this information, it would make sense that the overall assembled dimensions (interior and exterior) should be within, and controlled by, the +/- 1/8 inch overall tolerance of the RSC or die-cut blank.

One other note to toss in here. While the PMMI/FBA publication above may note that +/- 1/8 inch over all is acceptable, today’s customers are typically demanding something closer. With today’s drive and anvil technology +/- 1/16 inch (1/8 total) may generally be considered the norm, but more and more customers are demanding closer tolerances and expecting little to no variation.

— Ralph

Bake a cake in a box

January 31, 2018

Stan asks,

We have a customer who wants to bake a cake in our corrugated box. We use recycled paper from XXXXXXXXXX Mill in XXXXXXX. We also have a letter of ‘No Objection’ from Health Canada. Do you foresee any problem or restriction on this method of cake preparation?

Assuming you have some type of suitable and accepted barrier coating the only other concern would be heat. I assume that they are planning to bake in a conventional or convection oven. Since cakes typically bake at 350 degrees F you shouldn’t have to worry about the 451 degree combustion point of the paper.

If a microwave oven is to be used then there may be a few concerns about the paper and what comes into direct contact with it. A mass resting against paper in a microwave can cause temperatures to reach a point significant enough to cause scorching and even combustion of the paper. (I’ve ruined enough bags of pop corn to prove this point)

I’m not sure how the AIB may play into this if the products are to ship into the United States.

Let’s toss this one out to the readers and see what knowledge they have to share.

– Ralph