Archive for the ‘Rules and Laws’ Category

Proposed Change to the National Motor Freight Classification

May 15, 2013

The Commodity Classification Standards Board will have a public meeting on Monday, June 3, 2013 to consider changes to a standard that may impact you. The concern involves the transport of corrugated sheets by way of common carrier motor freight. If you ship sheets by a mode that this not owned by the combiner or is a contract carrier, this may be of interest to you. Below is a summary from Dave Carlson at FBA.

“The NMFTA/CCSB material that I have looked at is Docket 2013-2 for the June 3, 2013 CCSB meeting at Alexandria, VA. The only item of interest to the corrugated industry is Subject 14, which deals with changes in the classifications for shipping corrugated sheets. This is the third classification revision involving shipping corrugated products over the past 7 years. KD corrugated was changed in 2006, corrugated cut shapes (D/C), molded pulp, corner posts changed in 2011, and now we have sheets. The proposed classifications for sheets are not materially different than the classifications now in effect for the other two types of corrugated products, so I don’t think the industry has much of a leg to stand on a far as challenging the proposal. The end result will most likely be an opportunity for modest increases by motor carriers to transport corrugated sheets. While the classifications are standard for truckers, the rates they charge must be independently set, per antitrust regulations. However, the effects will be limited because the huge majority of sheets shipped in the U.S. are handled by contract carriers with rates established in the contracts between box plants and the truck lines. Another factor is that the classifications apply to interstate carriers with LTL freight. “

I have provided the Subject 14 material to our Technical Committee and asked for comments from them.”

— Ralph

UN HazMat Packaging Specifications

March 7, 2013

Steve asks:

We have a customer who has been manufacturing and shipping denatured alcohol in liter plastic bottles-both 6 and 12 bottles to a carton and is moving his operation to this area. The current container is marked ORM-D.
Please advise what I need to do or find out in order to satisfy his needs.

I believe you can find the information you need in the AICC publication ‘Understanding Hazardous Materials Requirements for Box Plants’? If you don’t already have this publication you can purchase one from the AICC On-Line Store (click here) or by calling 1-877-836-2422.

You may also click here to check out a previous Ask Ralph post on this topic that offers additional information.

-Ralph

Change Score on HAZMAT Certified Partition?

February 11, 2013

Kevin asks:

Can we change the creases on a corrugated insert to a perf profile without having to re-certify the entire corrugated package? The insert fits inside a corrugated RSC and is only there to separate the product. It was part of the original tests and both (RSC and patrician) are HAZMAT certified.

Okay, it doesn’t sound like the patrician is load bearing, so that’s good. It was part of the original test so there should be reference to it on the certification letter from the testing facility. Unless the certification letter specifically states the nature of the original insert, it should not be an issue. Check the paperwork.

Even if it doesn’t state a specific nature you may want to run the question past your test facility just to be safe.

-Ralph

Wrong Cert Stamp on HAZMAT Boxes

February 11, 2013

Tom asks:

I have a question regarding cert stamps. If we produced a doublewall case with a combination of 56-23-56-23-56, specifying it as a 61 ECT, but mistakenly stamped the cases with a 350# Mullen Stamp, would we not be in compliance with NMFTA? What implications would it have if the case carried HAZMAT product?

The board combination with three 56# liners could have an ECT values in the high eighties. It has more than enough Mullen potential to test above 350# test. You would be compliant with NMFTA. However, in the case of HazMat there could be an issue with the plus/minus basis weight requirement for the grade specified in the cert stamp.

-Ralph


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 70 other followers